Cloud Consulting Companies

  • BIG Data & Analytics
  • CLOUD
  • Data Center
  • IOT
  • Machine Learning & AI
  • SECURITY
  • Server
  • BlockChain
  • Virtualization
You are here: Home / Data Center / VMware sues new Nutanix CEO Ramaswami for breach of contract

VMware sues new Nutanix CEO Ramaswami for breach of contract

December 29, 2020 by cbn Leave a Comment

The rivalry between VMware and Nutanix spilled into court this week when VMware filed a lawsuit against Rajiv Ramaswami, weeks after he left VMware to become Nutanix CEO.

VMware on Monday night said it filed suit in Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara against Ramaswami. VMware did not name Nutanix as a defendant but charged Ramaswami with “material and ongoing breaches of his legal and contractual duties and obligations to VMware.”

Nutanix hired Ramaswami as CEO Dec. 9, after a three-month search for a replacement for retiring Nutanix founder Dheeraj Pandey. Pandey helped build the hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) pioneer into a $1 billion-plus revenue company since its 2009 founding, and Nutanix and VMware have combined for most of the HCI software market. Ramaswami had been VMware COO of products and cloud services since 2016.

Rajiv RamaswamiRajiv Ramaswami

VMware released a statement charging that “Rajiv Ramaswami failed to honor his fiduciary and contractual obligations to VMware. For at least two months before resigning from the company, at the same time he was working with senior leadership to shape VMware’s key strategic vision and direction, Mr. Ramaswami also was secretly meeting with at least the CEO, CFO, and apparently the entire board of directors of Nutanix, Inc. to become Nutanix’s Chief Executive Officer. He joined Nutanix as its CEO only two days after leaving VMware.”

VMware added that Ramaswami showed poor judgment and his negotiations with Nutanix represented a conflict of interest that he should have disclosed to VMware.

“VMware expects all employees to honor their commitments to the company, and executive officers should be held to an even higher standard,” VMware added in its statement. “VMware spends billions of dollars on its roadmap and R&D to bring market innovations to our customers and is committed to protecting our brand, the technological innovations behind our brand, and the value we bring to our customers.”

VMware added that it filed suit after failing to “resolve this matter without litigation” by reaching out to Ramaswami and Nutanix.

VMware did not disclose the goal of its lawsuit, but a person familiar with the matter said it is seeking monetary damages. He added that VMware made requests in communications with Ramaswami and Nutanix after the hiring was disclosed, but Nutanix claimed those requests fell outside of California law. Nutanix contends that VMware requested Ramaswami limit his role at CEO and agree to not hire any employees from VMware.

“Nutanix and Ramaswami assured VMware that Mr. Ramaswami agreed with his obligation not to take or misuse confidential information, and VMware does not contend otherwise,” Nutanix said in a statement released Tuesday. “However, VMware requested that Mr. Ramaswami agree to limit the ordinary performance of his job duties in a manner that would equate to an illegal non-compete covenant, and it requested that Nutanix agree not to hire candidates from VMware in a manner that Nutanix believes would be contrary to the federal antitrust laws.”

Nutanix also accused VMware of trying to deny Ramaswami an opportunity to become a CEO.

“VMware’s lawsuit seeks to make interviewing for a new job wrongful. We view VMware’s misguided action as a response to losing a deeply valued and respected member of its leadership team,” it added said in the statement. “Mr. Ramaswami is proud of his tenure at VMware and counts many VMware team members as friends. It is disappointing to see VMware’s management sue him just because he chose to pursue an opportunity to become a public company CEO. We believe that VMware’s action is nothing more than an unfounded attempt to hurt a competitor and we intend to vigorously defend this matter in court.”

California law is generally favorable to job-changers, and does not usually recognize non-compete agreements. The source familiar with the filing said Ramaswami would be prohibited from actions such as sabotaging VMware, recruiting co-workers while still employed there, stealing trade secrets or conducting business with customers on behalf of Nutanix while still working for VMware. But he said an employee is not required to disclose he is seeking a job with another company.

VMware-Nutanix battle over HCI market

The relationship between VMware and Nutanix has evolved from a close partnership to a fierce rivalry. VMware and its current parent company, Dell Technologies, helped Nutanix create the HCI market. Before VMware developed its own vSAN HCI software, its sales and support teams often recommended its customers buy Nutanix HCI systems as a way to manage storage in heavily virtualized data centers. Nutanix sales also received a jolt after it struck an OEM deal with Dell in 2014, a move that significantly expanded the startup’s market presence.

Three developments changed the VMware-Nutanix relationship. First, VMware launched vSAN in 2014, putting it in direct competition with Nutanix. The same year, Nutanix released its AHV hypervisor that competes with VMware’s ESX. Nutanix makes AHV available for free with its software stack, and allows organizations to migrate from ESX if they want to switch hypervisors.

Then Dell acquired storage giant EMC — the majority owner of VMware — in 2016. While Dell has continued its OEM deal with Nutanix, its sales of Nutanix software on Dell servers have dropped. The Dell EMC VxRail HCI system driven by vSAN is Nutanix’s main competitor, and Dell pushes that product to its customers over its Nutanix systems.

Nutanix also changed its sales strategy, which is now closer to VMware’s. While it continues to sell its own branded HCI systems, Nutanix has made its software available to run on all x86 servers and has built partnerships with HPE and Lenovo, and courted Cisco resellers.

The CEOs of VMware and Nutanix have taken shots at the rivals in public. During his 2019 VMworld keynote, VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger said his company was pulling away from Nutanix, without completely mentioning Nutanix by name.

“We’re crushing Nu … I mean we’re winning in the marketplace,” Gelsinger said. “We’re separating from No. 2. We’re winning in the space.” 

Pandey countered on a Nutanix earnings call a few days later that VMware “sells a lot of vaporware.”

Pandey also said he wanted Nutanix to replace VMWare as the “Switzerland of computing” by running across all major hardware platforms.

Who’s No. 1?

Research firm IDC’s latest HCI revenue tracker showed VMware leading with $821 million (40.2% share) in HCI software revenue for the third quarter of 2020. IDC listed Nutanix second with $513 million (25.1%).

However, even IDC’s research has been caught up in the VMware-Nutanix rivalry. Pandey criticized IDC’s numbers for years, calling them “funky accounting” and claiming they did not give Nutanix full credit for its software revenue.

Following IDC’s latest HCI release this month, Nutanix COO David Sangster posted a blog on LinkedIn that showed IDC crediting Nutanix with 28.4% of the HCI software market compared to VMware’s 14.5%. Those figures, which were not in IDC’s release, included sales of storage services not covered in the base HCI revenue.

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedinShare on Pinterest

Filed Under: Data Center

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • March 2016
  • October 2014

Recent Posts

  • Do you meet all the modern authentication requirements?
  • Cybersecurity Best Practices During War in Ukraine
  • Don’t Let Operational Risks Corrupt Your Hybrid Model
  • Microsoft Cost Management updates – June 2022
  • Roe v. Wade and the New, Murky Data Privacy Morass

Recent Comments

  • Purefit Keto Reviews on Are PDUs Your Best Platform for DCIM Instrumentation?
  • https://gemcr.org/ on 10 Things You Should Know About Deep Learning

Categories

  • BIG Data & Analytics
  • BlockChain
  • CLOUD
  • Data Center
  • IOT
  • Machine Learning & AI
  • SECURITY
  • Server
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtualization

Categories

  • BIG Data & Analytics (1,864)
  • BlockChain (416)
  • CLOUD (3,042)
  • Data Center (650)
  • IOT (1,992)
  • Machine Learning & AI (87)
  • SECURITY (1,464)
  • Server (2)
  • Uncategorized (2,016)
  • Virtualization (331)

Subscribe Our Newsletter

 Subscribing I accept the privacy rules of this site

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in